The Official Review Thread of 2018

User avatar
Precious Doll
Emeritus
Posts: 3589
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 2:20 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby Precious Doll » Sun Nov 18, 2018 4:47 am

Big Magilla wrote:On the other hand, what is the audience for Vice? Who wants to see a film about Cheney when we have even more evil men running the country now?


Indeed.

I rarely watch trailers on-line so I only saw the trailer for Vice a few days ago at the cinema. It looks sort of entertaining but nothing beyond that and its an Adam McKay film, which is only one step up from the likes of Michael Bay in my book. I didn't care from The Big Short which was nothing more the economics for dummies. However, Vice it is going to be a hard sell at the box office, particularly outside of the U.S. and despite a stellar cast, only a handful of actors can even get bums on seats these days internationally (Hanks, Streep, Cruise, Pitt, Lawrence, Di Caprio and a couple of others, and then only in the 'right' type of film).
“Those Koreans. They’re so suspicious, you know, ever since Hiroshima.” Constance Langdon (Jessica Lange) from American Horror Story: Season One

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 15817
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby Big Magilla » Sun Nov 18, 2018 2:33 am

Green Book could still rally when it goes wide. Word-of-mouth should help it beyond the critics. Let's keep in mind that it beat A Star Is Born for the audience award at Toronto, no guarantee of its Oscar potential but I wouldn't count it out yet.

On the other hand, what is the audience for Vice? Who wants to see a film about Cheney when we have even more evil men running the country now?
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.” - Voltaire

Mister Tee
Laureate
Posts: 6574
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby Mister Tee » Sun Nov 18, 2018 2:00 am

I'm a little gun-shy about proclaiming Green Book fully dead -- last year, I thought Darkest Hour was on its way to bust-hood, and it somewhat defied gravity, lasting at much higher levels than films usually do in this era. And don't forget The Greatest Showman.

But...I, too, was shocked by how low the average was in so few theatres. I was expecting something like $40-50K per. This is a film whose selling point is that audiences are going to fall head over heels in love with it, and a dud start like this kicks that narrative right in the ass. Mark Harris tweeted that, usually, when the predictor crowd is way more bullish on a movie than critics, audiences tend to validate the predictors. This is a rare case where they're not doing it.

In fact, I've been meaning to post about this for a day or two, but haven't found time: the Gurus of Gold have Green Book and A Star is Born as the top two contenders for the best picture prize. My reaction to that was, if the competition is down to a third remake of an 80-year old movie and a film with a 70 Metacritic score, either it's one of the worst years in memory, or these Gurus don't have a clue what they're talking about. I realize it's really late in the year, and all the most prominent alternative possibilities have serious handicaps (Roma too arty/subtitled, The Favourite a period piece and a bit out-there, First Man a box-office flare-out -- don't know about If Beale Street Could Talk, but it feels iffy, as well), but there's got to be something else to compete with those two. (I swear, I was ready to say, Don't sleep on the possibility of either VIce or The Mule swooping in and taking command -- and now, tonight, the trades are reporting significant enthusiasm for Vice. McKay might win the whole match this year, after competing heavily last time out.)

Like Sabin, I've been lackluster in my moviegoing this year, at least to some extent because the election was roughly 1000 times more important to me...but also because what's on offer hasn't been that inspiring. BJ is the only one of us to have seen the majority of contenders, so maybe he can confirm or contradict me on this: it seems to me this year represents a huge comedown from last year. Last year, I could cite multiple movies I saw as plausible Best PIcture winners (Three Billboards, Shape of Water, Lady Bird, Dunkirk), and others were making arguments for Get Out and The Post. (This is not even to mention fine work like Phantom Thread or Call Me by Your Name, which were outside the Academy wheelhouse but would have been solid choices.) This year seems almost the opposite -- every single contender has more drawbacks than positives in terms of winning a consensus prize.

Let me add that I saw Widows on Friday and enjoyed it immensely, so I'm sorry to see that one suffering box office woes. It's not exactly a flop -- an estimated $12 million opening should make it $30-45 million. But, like First Man, it's see as a potentially commercial effort that fell short, and Oscar voters tend to punish those things.

Sabin
Laureate
Posts: 7487
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby Sabin » Sun Nov 18, 2018 1:10 am

Precious Doll wrote
I think its a case of the change in cinema going habits of the general population that have been slowly going on for the last 5 years or so and its basically death by a thousand cuts before most theatrical films only play the festival circuit before heading to streaming services.

We're going to be there as soon as next year.

So sad.

Then again, I've never gone through a year where I've seen fewer movies than this one. I had my reasons, but we all know what Jean Renoir said about reasons.
"If you are marching with white nationalists, you are by definition not a very nice person. If Malala Yousafzai had taken part in that rally, you'd have to say 'Okay, I guess Malala sucks now.'" ~ John Oliver

User avatar
Precious Doll
Emeritus
Posts: 3589
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 2:20 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby Precious Doll » Sun Nov 18, 2018 12:06 am

The Original BJ wrote:Not totally sure where to place this, but it’s worth noting that both Widows (in wide release) and Green Book (in limited) struggled at the box office this weekend. This is now three big studio dramas (First Man being the other) that seemed poised to be box office hits AND Oscar players that have fallen short at least in terms of the former. (I also probably need to get out of the box office prediction business — I thought all three films would be hits even after I’d seen them.)



Earlier today I was shocked when I saw the screen average for Green Book. Only word of mouth is going to save that one but it looks DOA. Also films like Boy Erased, Beautiful Boy, The Old Man and the Gun failed to generate little interest from the public and The Front Runner is off to a bad start, though given its lukewarm at best response from critics that was to be expected. Based on the Friday estimate alone At Eternity's Gate looks like its tanked as well.

Back in 2010/2011 The King's Speech made at least $414 million worldwide. That box office gross for that type of film is unthinkable now.

I think its a case of the change in cinema going habits of the general population that have been slowly going on for the last 5 years or so and its basically death by a thousand cuts before most theatrical films only play the festival circuit before heading to streaming services.

A large number of the films I have seen on the big screen this year have been at festival screenings. At least half of these screenings are well attended. Aside from a small handful of regular releases most the screenings I've attended throughout they year, even on days were tickets are as cheap as $5, the cinema are virtually empty. Its a mixture of festival screenings, blockbusters and candy bar sales that are keeping cinemas afloat.
“Those Koreans. They’re so suspicious, you know, ever since Hiroshima.” Constance Langdon (Jessica Lange) from American Horror Story: Season One

The Original BJ
Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 8:49 pm

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby The Original BJ » Sat Nov 17, 2018 10:10 pm

Not totally sure where to place this, but it’s worth noting that both Widows (in wide release) and Green Book (in limited) struggled at the box office this weekend. This is now three big studio dramas (First Man being the other) that seemed poised to be box office hits AND Oscar players that have fallen short at least in terms of the former. (I also probably need to get out of the box office prediction business — I thought all three films would be hits even after I’d seen them.)

All of this also means that a year that looked like it could have a lot of overlap between box office hits and Oscar players will now be another where most of the award favorites are lower grosses. I imagine that’s a big boon to something like Black Panther, which is (along with A Star is Born) one of the few financial success stories that awards voters could rally around this year (especially anyone wanting to make the case that the Academy doesn’t need that Popular Film prize.)

anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 5260
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby anonymous1980 » Sat Nov 17, 2018 9:10 am

FANTASTIC BEASTS: THE CRIMES OF GRINDELWALD
Cast: Eddie Redmayne, Katharine Waterston, Dan Fogler, Alison Sudol, Johnny Depp, Jude Law, Ezra Miller, Zoe Kravitz, Callum Turner, Carmen Ejogo, Claudia Kim.
Dir: David Yates.

The second installment of the JK Rowling's Harry Potter Wizarding World prequels has Newt Scamander becoming an unwilling participant in the hunt for Grindelwald, the pre-Voldemort villain of the Wizarding World. I'm a huge Potterhead and let me warn you, if you're not a Harry Potter fan and you walked into this without reading any of the books or seeing any of the movies, it might as well be a foreign-language film. It will definitely not appeal to you. But there are some nice visual touches in here and it does contain Rowling's soaring imagination. If only the script was stronger because a lot of it doesn't make too much sense (even to a Potter fan like yours truly). It's harmless and disposable.

Oscar Prospects: Production Design and Costume Design are possible.

Grade: C+

User avatar
flipp525
Laureate
Posts: 5855
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 7:44 am

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby flipp525 » Tue Nov 13, 2018 7:30 pm

Suspria. Wow.
"The mantle of spinsterhood was definitely in her shoulders. She was twenty five and looked it."

-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell

dws1982
Tenured
Posts: 3010
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 9:28 pm
Location: AL
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby dws1982 » Sun Nov 11, 2018 1:33 pm

I kind of agree on Outlaw King. I think the story of Robert the Bruce is a good one, but a two-hour movie was the wrong format unless Mackenzie wanted to focus in on one specific aspect of the larger story (like Spielberg did with Lincoln). And it may just be me, but I thought it was off-puttingly, pornographically violent at times.

Sabin
Laureate
Posts: 7487
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby Sabin » Sat Nov 10, 2018 5:41 pm

Outlaw King is a movie for people who think the last minute of Braveheart needed to be a full feature. Those people are wrong.

I knew it was going to be pretty terrible within the first minute. At all times, it feels like actors wearing costumes. Chris Pine isn’t believable at all in this role. The relationships aren’t developed, so the deaths feel meaningless. The story isn’t a full narrative, such that when the final battle ended, I was shocked to learn that was the end of the movie. It’s like watching a miniseries compressed into a feature, and with all the Games of Thrones walk-ons, I wondered if that was Netflix’s strategy.

Honestly, it made me appreciate Braveheart (a movie I don’t like) a little bit more.
"If you are marching with white nationalists, you are by definition not a very nice person. If Malala Yousafzai had taken part in that rally, you'd have to say 'Okay, I guess Malala sucks now.'" ~ John Oliver

dws1982
Tenured
Posts: 3010
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 9:28 pm
Location: AL
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby dws1982 » Sat Nov 10, 2018 4:33 pm

American Animals
May be more-or-less a Wikipedia Movie (TM Sabin), with the twist that the narrative is intercut with interviews with the real-life participants and their families, but it's an entertaining one. For those who don't know, this is a true story of four young college students who decide to attempt an audacious-as-hell art heist at Transylvania University. Why would four well-off young men--who all seem well-positioned for a comfortable, successful life--attempt something that could potentially land them in prison for years? I don't know that the movie is quite satisfying in answering that question. Yes, it's pretty clear that there's a sense of millennial boredom at play, but I'm not totally convinced of that explanation when it comes to the two guys who join the plot mid-film. Why would Blake Jenner's character, a health-nut entrepreneur (it's mentioned that he bought his first rental property at 16) who seems more like a Winklevoss brother than anything, throw everything away to drive getaway for these guys? I'm not sure, and the movie isn't too interested in answering that question. But like I said, it's an entertaining film, and an interesting one. The cast is very solid, but honestly I think Bart Layton's razor-sharp instinct for using music is about the best thing this movie has going for it. More than the hybrid documentary approach, I think it really comes to life during some of the musical montages, and I'm not usually a fan of montages.

anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 5260
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby anonymous1980 » Sat Nov 10, 2018 8:41 am

OVERLORD
Cast: Jovan Adepo, Wyatt Russell, Mathilde Ollivier, Pilou Asbæk, John Magaro, Bokeem Woodbine, Iain De Caestecker, Jacob Anderson, Dominic Applewhite, Gianny Taufer.
Dir: Julius Avery.

It's World War II and a group of American soldiers are tasked to take down a German radio tower located in the middle of a church in a French town. They get there and find something even more horrible. This movie, I must say, gets really bloody, really violent and really insane....but in a way that kind of delights me. It's a film which manages to be a pretty good war film while combining elements of fantastical horror to great effect. It's strictly B-movie stuff but done quite well. It helps that the ensemble cast plays it straight while the script is pretty solid. Yeah, this is a bloody good time.

Oscar Prospects: Makeup & Hairstyling is possible.

Grade: B+

anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 5260
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby anonymous1980 » Fri Nov 02, 2018 12:58 pm

THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WIND
Cast: John Huston, Oda Kajar, Peter Bogdanovich, Susan Strasberg, Mercedes McCambridge, Bob Random, Lilli Palmer, Edmond O'Brien.
Dir: Orson Welles.

Yes, Orson Welles last film dropped on Netflix....still such a weird phrase. In this one, an aging Hollywood director struggles to finish his last film after his leading actor walked off the set. The film is a mockumentary of sorts on a party with industry types and journalists with a screening of the film. It's very heartening to know that Orson Welles was still breaking rules and experimenting on the art form. This is a wild ride that has potential to enthrall and infuriate the viewer. It is very meta. I could best describe it as a sort of dark and totally fucked up Day for Night or a more cynical 8 1/2. You can tell there is a bit of anger in it but with a lot of love for the art form. We may never know how close this is to Orson Welles's original vision but it is a damn good film and essential for any student of film. Even beyond the grave, Welles still surprises.

Oscar Prospects: Did Netflix qualify this? I'm not sure.

Grade: A-

anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 5260
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby anonymous1980 » Fri Nov 02, 2018 6:59 am

BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY
Cast: Rami Malek, Lucy Boynton, Gwilym Lee, Ben Hardy, Joe Mazzello, Aidan Gillen, Allen Leech, Tom Hollander, Mike Myers.
Dir: Bryan Singer.

This is a musical biopic on Freddie Mercury and Queen set in the 1970's and 1980's. I love Queen, a lot of their songs are among my all-time favorites so I would've been interested in a Freddie Mercury biopic. Divorced from the real-life behind-the-scenes drama involving director (or co-director, should I say) Bryan Singer, this is pretty much a standard issue, formulaic and slickly made musical biopic that lives and dies on the performance of Rami Malek who truly knocks it out of the park. He is actually so good, everyone else in the film is almost anonymous and forgettable. If it came out that he actually SANG his part rather than lip-synched, Malek would be the front-runner for the Best Actor Oscar by now. I think it was also a mistake to sanitize the story down to a PG-13. This should've been an R though thankfully Mercury's bisexuality and struggle with AIDS is still in there. Overall, it's fine.

Oscar Prospects: Rami Malek is a contender but he has to overcome the film's mediocre reviews. Costume Design, Makeup & Hairstyling and Sound Mixing are possible had they gotten better reviews.

Grade: B-

User avatar
Precious Doll
Emeritus
Posts: 3589
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 2:20 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby Precious Doll » Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:03 am

Reza wrote:
anonymous1980 wrote:SUSPIRIA
Cast: Dakota Johnson, Tilda Swinton, Mia Goth, Chloe Grace Moretz, Jessica Harper, Angela Winkler, Ingrid Caven, Renée Soutendijk, Alek Wek.
Dir: Luca Guadagnino.

Dario Argento's classic giallo film is one of my favorite horror films of all time. But even I thought it would be interesting to see Luca Guadagnino, a filmmaker I've grown to admire the past few years, try and remake it. Well, the basic concept is still the same: A young American woman goes to Germany to study dance in a prestigious dance academy which turns out to be a coven of witches. But that's pretty much where the two films' commonality ends. The film goes into such a different direction, a direction that some people may not like. Personally, I was kind of impressed. Luca Guadagnino brought something new to the story, made his own spin yet remains respectful of its source material. His style make the horror stuff really get under your skin. His use of sound is really masterful. It's a slow-burn and can piss people off but I came off really loving this.

Oscar Prospects: I think it's the front-runner to WIN Makeup & Hairstyling. Also possible: Original Score, Original Song, Production Design, Costume Design and Sound Mixing. I think Tilda Swinton's too weird for a Supporting Actress nom for three roles.

Grade: A-


If Guadagnino has gone a different route with the material then I may watch it. The Dario Argento version was utter tripe.


I love the Argento film and plan on watching it again before seeing the Guadagnino film. His already remade one film La Piscine with rather mixed results and I have found his original films such as I Am Love & Call Me By Your Name far superior. The remake of Suspiria has some interesting cast members like Jessica Harper (from the original), Angela Winkler, Ingrid Caven, & Renée Soutendijk but I could do without Johnson and remake queen Moretz. I saw the trailer earlier in the week and to be frank didn't know what to make of it.
“Those Koreans. They’re so suspicious, you know, ever since Hiroshima.” Constance Langdon (Jessica Lange) from American Horror Story: Season One


Return to “2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests