Web of Sex Scandals

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 15584
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Big Magilla » Mon Nov 20, 2017 8:34 am

Precious Doll wrote:It's just a link to an opinion piece of which more will follow. It will certainly could be a potentially very awkward viewing experience.

But this on-going scandal, with new allegations emerging almost daily, are changing the entertainment industry and how people view it.

http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/aw ... fcc24ff69b

I'm assuming the Kyle Smith who wrote this is the arch-conservative former N.Y. Post critic, and not some Australian dude with the same name.

Yes, we can expect more of the same from the righteous right and the indignant left, while those in the middle mostly shrug.

I don't know anything about Jeffrey Tambor off-screen, but if the accusations are true, then he did the right thing in walking off Transparent. If they're not, then he should have held his ground and waited to be vindicated, but one can certainly understand his wanting to distance himself from the fray.

As I've said before, there's a witch hunt going on that will take the innocent with the guilty.

How do the mainstream Republicans get to give the middle finger to that odious hypocritical pig from Alabama while playing footsie with Trump?

How do Trump and Clarence Thomas get to keep their jobs while Bill Clinton gets re-tried on TV and in the press by card-carrying liberals as well as conservatives?

Why do little old ladies in New Jersey pass along Conservative News articles with screaming headlines like "why is no one talking about Joe Biden getting naked in front of a female secret service agent?"

They're not going to cancel the Oscars, or the Globes, or any of the other awards shows, but it will be interesting to see which A-listers show up as presenters and which ones don't.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.” - Voltaire

User avatar
Precious Doll
Tenured
Posts: 3254
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 2:20 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Precious Doll » Mon Nov 20, 2017 2:48 am

It's just a link to an opinion piece of which more will follow. It will certainly could be a potentially very awkward viewing experience.

But this on-going scandal, with new allegations emerging almost daily, are changing the entertainment industry and how people view it.

http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/aw ... fcc24ff69b
"I have no interest in all of that. I find that all tabloid stupidity" Woody Allen, The Guardian, 2014, in response to his adopted daughter's allegations.

Greg
Tenured
Posts: 2699
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: Greg
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Greg » Sun Nov 19, 2017 7:33 pm

Jeffrey Tambor Announces He's Leaving Transparent Amid Sexual Harassment Allegations:

http://people.com/tv/jeffrey-tambor-not ... ansparent/
You can resist an invading army; you cannot resist an idea whose time has come.

Victor Hugo

ITALIANO
Emeritus
Posts: 3955
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:58 pm
Location: MILAN
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby ITALIANO » Sun Nov 19, 2017 2:13 pm

Sonic Youth wrote:
"I just made the most epic prediction ever" meaning I just predicted Senator Al Franken would be the next politician to get caught up in the accusations. This renders your response to me a complete non-sequitur.


Good to know :D

User avatar
Sonic Youth
Laureate
Posts: 7436
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:35 pm
Location: USA

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Sonic Youth » Sun Nov 19, 2017 10:14 am

ITALIANO wrote:
Sonic Youth wrote:
Mister Tee wrote:Even if you assume her story is 100% accurate (and, we can't help but notice, she appears regularly on Sean Hannity's show, and the dread Roger Stone was given enough heads-up on the story to tweet about it last night), to equate this with sexual assault confirms my fear that any and all gaucheries are going to start being lumped together. What Roy Moore, Harvey Weinstein, Louis CK and Kevin Spacey are accused of doing is genuinely horrible; what Franken did (in the first case, and maybe even the second) was puerile.


Whether this is true or not should have absolutely no bearing on the fact that I just made the most epic prediction ever!


The prediction in itself isn't epic, of course. I thought it was quite obvious actually. But the way it was misunderstood - leading to you and others accusing me of being pro-rape and pro- paedophilia (I had never mentioned children, of course!) - was of epic proportions, really. Of hysterically epic proportions.


"I just made the most epic prediction ever" meaning I just predicted Senator Al Franken would be the next politician to get caught up in the accusations. This renders your response to me a complete non-sequitur.
"What the hell?"
Win Butler

ITALIANO
Emeritus
Posts: 3955
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:58 pm
Location: MILAN
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby ITALIANO » Sun Nov 19, 2017 4:46 am

Sonic Youth wrote:
Mister Tee wrote:Even if you assume her story is 100% accurate (and, we can't help but notice, she appears regularly on Sean Hannity's show, and the dread Roger Stone was given enough heads-up on the story to tweet about it last night), to equate this with sexual assault confirms my fear that any and all gaucheries are going to start being lumped together. What Roy Moore, Harvey Weinstein, Louis CK and Kevin Spacey are accused of doing is genuinely horrible; what Franken did (in the first case, and maybe even the second) was puerile.


Whether this is true or not should have absolutely no bearing on the fact that I just made the most epic prediction ever!


The prediction in itself isn't epic, of course. I thought it was quite obvious actually. But the way it was misunderstood - leading to you and others accusing me of being pro-rape and pro- paedophilia (I had never mentioned children, of course!) - was of epic proportions, really. Of hysterically epic proportions. And very interesting, I think. This board has helped me alot through the years - not only when it comes to movies and the Oscars, as the level of discussions is one of the highest on the web. But also when it comes to, let's say, the way group mentality works (and not only in America. But only in America a simple photo of a person looking at another signing autographs can be commented in the way I've seen on some sites). I am always a bit scared by such attitude, but, I swear, not when it's about me here - I've stopped taking you seriously long ago, so, believe me, you can attack me any time you want, dont worry - but when I imagine how it can be applied to others, in much more important contexts. But I guess that what I find scary, others can find reassuring. And that's of course one of the reasons why such reactions happen.

User avatar
Sonic Youth
Laureate
Posts: 7436
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:35 pm
Location: USA

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Sonic Youth » Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:48 pm

Mister Tee wrote:Even if you assume her story is 100% accurate (and, we can't help but notice, she appears regularly on Sean Hannity's show, and the dread Roger Stone was given enough heads-up on the story to tweet about it last night), to equate this with sexual assault confirms my fear that any and all gaucheries are going to start being lumped together. What Roy Moore, Harvey Weinstein, Louis CK and Kevin Spacey are accused of doing is genuinely horrible; what Franken did (in the first case, and maybe even the second) was puerile.


Whether this is true or not should have absolutely no bearing on the fact that I just made the most epic prediction ever!
"What the hell?"

Win Butler

ITALIANO
Emeritus
Posts: 3955
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:58 pm
Location: MILAN
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby ITALIANO » Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:50 am

Mister Tee wrote: any and all gaucheries are going to start being lumped together. .


Which is exactly what I predicted would happen. And more WILL happen, trust me.

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 15584
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Big Magilla » Thu Nov 16, 2017 10:34 pm

Mister Tee wrote:
Big Magilla wrote:The state to worry about is New Jersey. If the ethics committee recommends and the senate agrees to expel Menendez before his Democratic successor takes over, Chris Christie gets to name his replacement.


Why would this happen when the prosecution ended in mistrial?


It shouldn't, of course, and hopefully won't, but there have been calls from the Rebubs to do just that.

Mister Tee wrote:
Big Magilla wrote:I don't want to fall into the habit of defending people just because they're on my side, but the initial reaction to Al Franken strikes me as pretty hysterically over the top. He posed for a douchey, meant-to-be-funny-in-a-frat-boy-way-but-wasn't photo (where he isn't touching the woman), and of kissing that woman way harder than she was expecting (though this detail he disputes). Even if you assume her story is 100% accurate (and, we can't help but notice, she appears regularly on Sean Hannity's show, and the dread Roger Stone was given enough heads-up on the story to tweet about it last night), to equate this with sexual assault confirms my fear that any and all gaucheries are going to start being lumped together. What Roy Moore, Harvey Weinstein, Louis CK and Kevin Spacey are accused of doing is genuinely horrible; what Franken did (in the first case, and maybe even the second) was puerile. If there are additional women who accuse him of the kissing maneuver the woman mentions, then he's got job trouble. But if this is essentially a one-off, I think it's ridiculous to say he should resign.


Breaking now, the tweeter-in-chief wants to know where Franken's hands were "in pictures 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6?" while still staying mute on Moore. He, not Franken, is the one who should resign, but that won't happen. Franken will survive this, but already the so-called liberal media is blowing this up way out of proportion the way they did Hillary's e-maisl to show their impartiality, as if what Franken did is anywhre near equal to the disgusting, criminal things Moore did.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.” - Voltaire

Mister Tee
Laureate
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Mister Tee » Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:03 pm

Big Magilla wrote:
Sabin wrote:The state to worry about is New Jersey. If the ethics committee recommends and the senate agrees to expel Menendez before his Democratic successor takes over, Chris Christie gets to name his replacement.


Why would this happen when the prosecution ended in mistrial?

I don't want to fall into the habit of defending people just because they're on my side, but the initial reaction to Al Franken strikes me as pretty hysterically over the top. He posed for a douchey, meant-to-be-funny-in-a-frat-boy-way-but-wasn't photo (where he isn't touching the woman), and of kissing that woman way harder than she was expecting (though this detail he disputes). Even if you assume her story is 100% accurate (and, we can't help but notice, she appears regularly on Sean Hannity's show, and the dread Roger Stone was given enough heads-up on the story to tweet about it last night), to equate this with sexual assault confirms my fear that any and all gaucheries are going to start being lumped together. What Roy Moore, Harvey Weinstein, Louis CK and Kevin Spacey are accused of doing is genuinely horrible; what Franken did (in the first case, and maybe even the second) was puerile. If there are additional women who accuse him of the kissing maneuver the woman mentions, then he's got job trouble. But if this is essentially a one-off, I think it's ridiculous to say he should resign.

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 15584
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Big Magilla » Thu Nov 16, 2017 6:00 pm

Sabin wrote:Working today but here a thought...if the tax plan doesn’t pass the senate will they cry foul bc Franken should have resigned?

What would Franken's resignation have to do with it? The governor of Minnesota is a Democrat. He would replace him with another Democrat.

The state to worry about is New Jersey. If the ethics committee recommends and the senate agrees to expel Menendez before his Democratic successor takes over, Chris Christie gets to name his replacement.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.” - Voltaire

Sabin
Laureate
Posts: 7324
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Sabin » Thu Nov 16, 2017 5:35 pm

Working today but here a thought...if the tax plan doesn’t pass the senate will they cry foul bc Franken should have resigned?
"If you are marching with white nationalists, you are by definition not a very nice person. If Malala Yousafzai had taken part in that rally, you'd have to say 'Okay, I guess Malala sucks now.'" ~ John Oliver

User avatar
Sonic Youth
Laureate
Posts: 7436
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:35 pm
Location: USA

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Sonic Youth » Thu Nov 16, 2017 12:50 pm

I didn't think it would've happened in 2006, though!
"What the hell?"

Win Butler

FilmFan720
Tenured
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 3:57 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Web Of Sex Scandals

Postby FilmFan720 » Thu Nov 16, 2017 10:35 am

Sonic Youth wrote:BTW, before we get too smug about this... you know this is eventually going to happen to a Democrat too, right? My money's on Al Franken.


Damn it, Sonic Youth!

http://thehill.com/homenews/news/360656 ... ut-consent
"Go into the world and do well. But more importantly, go into the world and do good."
- Minor Myers, Jr.

dws1982
Tenured
Posts: 2940
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 9:28 pm
Location: AL
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby dws1982 » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:55 am

dws1982 wrote:A group of pastors from Alabama signed a letter of support for Moore today. As a Christian this is one of the more shameful things I've seen in the fallout of these scandals. As one person on Twitter put it, if you support Moore at this point, you should just admit that party ID is more important than common decency and give up any claim to moral authority or religious virtue.

Okay, so more context on this letter: It was actually compiled and signed early in the primary process. Moore (and his wife, apparently) brought it out and tried to pass it off as some new showing of support, and many of the pastors who had signed it have demanded that their names be removed. Of course I don't think a pastor has any business publicly endorsing political candidates at all, and I have to question their theology if they were supporting Moore at any point, but at least it's not as bad as it sounded.

And several Democrats have explicitly stated that Moore should be expelled, so I'm going to say your scenario seems unlikely, OG. For all the crap Moore has been talking about McConnell, if he gets to the Senate he's going to vote with him that majority of the time, except on the occasions where McConnell is doing something that needs bipartisan support.


Return to “Current Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest