Web of Sex Scandals

User avatar
taki15
Temp
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:29 am

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby taki15 » Thu Nov 30, 2017 5:42 pm

Don't be so hard on Lauer. He was just helping a fellow sexual predator.

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 16191
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Big Magilla » Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:13 am

Sonic Youth wrote:
Greg wrote:This is an even bigger surprise than Charlie Rose.


Eh, not really. Because nothing surprises anymore.

But Matt Lauer takes the cake, wears the crown, whatever cliche you want to use. Just dumbfounding.

http://variety.com/2017/biz/news/matt-l ... 202625959/

The special lock he installed for his office.... the lengths NBC went to in order to protect this guy, up to and including this morning... all totally normal, right? I mean, people are not perfect and you gotta think of the bottom line.

(BTW, it was amusing to read that Keillor's wife - a classical violinist - is named Jenny Lind Nilsson. Classical music aficionados will understand.)

I was as shocked as you can be these days by Charlie Rose, but not Matt Lauer. I never liked him, always thought he was a phony. That hardboiled interview of Hillary and softball interview of Trump last year was the last straw, not that I ever watched him much anyway, but after that I couldn't take him at all.
“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” - Voltaire

User avatar
Precious Doll
Emeritus
Posts: 3905
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 2:20 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Precious Doll » Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:51 am

These scandals are spreading worldwide as they should. This is a rundown on a 'popular' Australian gardening TV host. I've never seen the show and have never given the man a second thought - would recognise him if I walked past him - but apparently he is a huge celebrity. Don't read if eating, it is beyond sickening behaviour spanning over 20 years:

http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/ce ... f2227a365c
“Those Koreans. They’re so suspicious, you know, ever since Hiroshima.” Constance Langdon (Jessica Lange) from American Horror Story: Season One

User avatar
Precious Doll
Emeritus
Posts: 3905
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 2:20 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Precious Doll » Thu Nov 30, 2017 12:34 am

“Those Koreans. They’re so suspicious, you know, ever since Hiroshima.” Constance Langdon (Jessica Lange) from American Horror Story: Season One

User avatar
Sonic Youth
Laureate
Posts: 7443
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:35 pm
Location: USA

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Sonic Youth » Wed Nov 29, 2017 8:54 pm

Greg wrote:This is an even bigger surprise than Charlie Rose.


Eh, not really. Because nothing surprises anymore.

But Matt Lauer takes the cake, wears the crown, whatever cliche you want to use. Just dumbfounding.

http://variety.com/2017/biz/news/matt-l ... 202625959/

The special lock he installed for his office.... the lengths NBC went to in order to protect this guy, up to and including this morning... all totally normal, right? I mean, people are not perfect and you gotta think of the bottom line.

(BTW, it was amusing to read that Keillor's wife - a classical violinist - is named Jenny Lind Nilsson. Classical music aficionados will understand.)
"What the hell?"
Win Butler

Greg
Tenured
Posts: 2808
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: Greg
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Greg » Wed Nov 29, 2017 2:59 pm

This is an even bigger surprise than Charlie Rose.

Garrison Keillor Accused Of 'Inappropriate Behavior,' Minnesota Public Radio Says:

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way ... radio-says

User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 12686
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby OscarGuy » Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:47 am

Stop comparing Al Franken to Roy Moore.

Roy Moore is a child predator and has been accused by several women.

Al Franken groped two women and has had two dozen (his former staffers and his former SNL colleagues) come forward and say the were never treated with anything but respect.

They are not equivalent. They will never be equivalent. Franken might be a tad bit skeezy at times, but he's not a fucking predator, especially not a CHILD predator.

This has zero to do with politics. Republicans tend to largely defend their predators whereas Dems tend to run them out on a rail. Clinton is not germane to the situation as we are in different clime today than we were two decades ago. It does not excuse what he did, but the two situations are not even remotely similar. Clinton hasn't been a candidate in two decades. Moore IS a candidate and whether you agree with what Clinton did or not, again, the two are NOT the same. Moore is a CHILD PREDATOR. There is no moral equivalence.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 16191
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Big Magilla » Thu Nov 23, 2017 7:47 am

As I said before, the charges against Clinton were dismissed because of all the proven false charges against him in other instances. And, again, he isn't running for anything!

I agree that if here are substantial charges against Franken he should e treated the same as any other politician and he should be drummed out of office as quickly as uber liberals Harvey Weinstein and Charlie Rose were dumped, but so far the charges have been more than a little on the silly side. Turn off Fox News!
“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” - Voltaire

User avatar
criddic3
Tenured
Posts: 2770
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: New York, USA
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby criddic3 » Thu Nov 23, 2017 2:24 am

Big Magilla wrote:
criddic3 wrote:Clinton is getting hit on his past again because in the Age of Trump, many people realize how much he got away with simply because of politics. If we're going to go after the Roy Moores of the world and say he shouldn't be a Senator, then we have to be honest about how hypocritical it is to look the other way for other people.


What did Clinton do that wasn't known twenty years ago? I may be a little fuzzy on the facts, but as I recall, his relationships with those women were consensual. He was neither a predator nor a child molester. The damnable thing about the whole mess was the cover-up. It's a shame that despite all his accomplishments, the quote most of us remember from his days in the White House is "I did not have sex with that woman."

criddic3 wrote:On the other hand, we now have people rushing to Al Franken and Roy Moore's defense based on ideological grounds.


I don't find any evidence of people defending Franken on ideological grounds. No one is saying what he did in the first reported incident was excusable, but it hardly rises to the level of what Moore or Bill Cosby or Harvey Weinstein or Kevin Spacey or Charlie Rose did. I found the second reported Franken incident silly, but then those old pictures of him grabbing Ariana Huffington surfaced, making me wonder if he really didn't grab that woman by the butt on purpose. Still, it's nothing compared to what those other men did, and in some instances (Weinstein, Spacey) were still doing when the reports surfaced.


It is true that Clinton has not been accused of being a child molester, but has been accused of rape which had been dismissed by a lot of people in the past. An open letter was released in which 30-some-odd women came to Franken's defense saying he's an "upstanding public servant" or to that effect, similar to how those on the political right are saying that Roy Moore should be given the benefit of the doubt because it will the serve conservative cause. It seems like people are willing to dismiss or set aside allegations like this when the person in question agrees with their political ideology. We can't have it both ways. Either everyone accused has to face the music or we all need to step back and let these people defend themselves without judgment until a conclusion can be made about their guilt, and how their actions should be dealt with if that is the case. I don't think it's helpful to say "he may have done something bad but let's overlook that for now to keep that seat in our column," which seems to be happening in both cases.
“If there’s a concrete wall in front of you, go through it,” Donald J. Trump (May, 2004)

ITALIANO
Emeritus
Posts: 4076
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:58 pm
Location: MILAN
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby ITALIANO » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:32 pm

No, it doesn't necessarily have to do with power, but yes. physical attractiveness doesn't have anything to do with it.

User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 12686
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby OscarGuy » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:02 pm

It's about power. That's my point. Assault, abuse, rape, and harassment is about power, not about physical attractiveness. My point is that he would have had plenty of offers, meaning that unless he was a Grade A douchebag, he never would have had to assault, or rape, or harass someone. Attractive people who abuse others do it because of power, not because they don't have women (and men) who are readily willing to engage in physical relations with them.
Wesley Lovell

"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin

User avatar
flipp525
Laureate
Posts: 5897
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 7:44 am

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby flipp525 » Wed Nov 22, 2017 12:49 pm

OscarGuy wrote:Attractive people generally don't have to solicit sex or force others into sex.

This is a truly ridiculous assertion.
"The mantle of spinsterhood was definitely in her shoulders. She was twenty five and looked it."

-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 16191
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Big Magilla » Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:08 am

dws1982 wrote:
Big Magilla wrote:
criddic3 wrote:Clinton is getting hit on his past again because in the Age of Trump, many people realize how much he got away with simply because of politics. If we're going to go after the Roy Moores of the world and say he shouldn't be a Senator, then we have to be honest about how hypocritical it is to look the other way for other people.


What did Clinton do that wasn't known twenty years ago? I may be a little fuzzy on the facts, but as I recall, his relationships with those women were consensual.

When you consider the vast power differential that was at play in the relationship he had with those women, I think it becomes really tough to argue that those relationships could've been consensual.

Maybe not, and maybe we would've been better off with Al Gore in the White House, but if Clinton "got away with it" it wasn't because of politics. It was because of politics that he was hounded by Ken Starr. He "go away with it" because after all the false charges made against the Clintons by the righteous right, it was difficult to believe that the Paula Jones and Juanita Broderick charges weren't more of the same. The Monica Lewinsky affair and some of the others when he was the Arkansas governor were seen as consensual.

If all this were coming out now for the first time, it would be seen in a different light, but there's nothing new here. Clinton never bragged about his conquests like Trump did. He's not running for anything and neither is his wife. We should be looking forward, not backward.
“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” - Voltaire

dws1982
Tenured
Posts: 3103
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 9:28 pm
Location: AL
Contact:

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby dws1982 » Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:47 am

Big Magilla wrote:
criddic3 wrote:Clinton is getting hit on his past again because in the Age of Trump, many people realize how much he got away with simply because of politics. If we're going to go after the Roy Moores of the world and say he shouldn't be a Senator, then we have to be honest about how hypocritical it is to look the other way for other people.


What did Clinton do that wasn't known twenty years ago? I may be a little fuzzy on the facts, but as I recall, his relationships with those women were consensual.

When you consider the vast power differential that was at play in the relationship he had with those women, I think it becomes really tough to argue that those relationships could've been consensual.

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 16191
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Web of Sex Scandals

Postby Big Magilla » Wed Nov 22, 2017 8:04 am

OscarGuy wrote:Huffington says that the pics that surfaced were for a comedy sketch and that she felt in no way harassed or assaulted by them.

Yes, but they do show a propensity for that kind of behavior, which though not damning, do show a pattern that makes these allegations more credible, though again nothing to demand his resignation for - so far, anyway.
“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” - Voltaire


Return to “Current Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests