New Developments III

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 16212
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: New Developments III

Postby Big Magilla » Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:36 pm

As the pundits keep reminding us, the Democrats hoped Reagan would win the Republican nomination in 1980 because he couldn't win the general election. Be careful what you wish for.

User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 12689
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Re: New Developments III

Postby OscarGuy » Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:31 pm

Gingrich is the best and worst thing that could happen to the Republican party. Having a right wing idealogue on the top of your ticket will show the Republican National Convention just how unelectable someone like that is on a national level.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin

Greg
Tenured
Posts: 2810
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: Greg
Contact:

Re: New Developments III

Postby Greg » Mon Jan 23, 2012 3:13 pm

Fresh off of his big win in the South Carolina primary, Newt Gingrich is now leading in the most recent polls in Florida.

User avatar
taki15
Temp
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:29 am

Re: New Developments III

Postby taki15 » Mon Jan 23, 2012 7:30 am

Are Republicans really going to nominate Newt Gingrich? If they do so, then Obama will officially be the luckiest man alive.

User avatar
Sonic Youth
Laureate
Posts: 7443
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:35 pm
Location: USA

Re: New Developments III

Postby Sonic Youth » Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:39 pm

It happened during A Separation's win.

How will this affect A Separation's chances for Best Foreign Language film at the Oscars? I say it's a bad sign.
"What the hell?"
Win Butler

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 16212
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: New Developments III

Postby Big Magilla » Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:23 pm

Sonic's comment appeared a good 45 minutes before Streep. I was still awake.

Sabin
Tenured Laureate
Posts: 7696
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Re: New Developments III

Postby Sabin » Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:21 pm

He did so somewhere between Meryl Streep and George Clooney.
"If you are marching with white nationalists, you are by definition not a very nice person. If Malala Yousafzai had taken part in that rally, you'd have to say 'Okay, I guess Malala sucks now.'" ~ John Oliver

User avatar
Sonic Youth
Laureate
Posts: 7443
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:35 pm
Location: USA

Re: New Developments III

Postby Sonic Youth » Sun Jan 15, 2012 9:45 pm

Huntsman just dropped out.
"What the hell?"

Win Butler

User avatar
Damien
Laureate
Posts: 6331
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:43 pm
Location: New York, New York
Contact:

Re: New Developments III

Postby Damien » Sat Jan 14, 2012 3:04 am

Okri wrote:Is this a real ad? It says "Paid for by Newt" at the end, but wouldn't it say something else?


Yes, that actually is a real Newt ad. Don't vote for somebody because he speaks French.

Such is the world of Republicans in 2012.
"Y'know, that's one of the things I like about Mitt Romney. He's been consistent since he changed his mind." -- Christine O'Donnell

Okri
Tenured
Posts: 2669
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:28 pm
Location: Edmonton, AB

Re: New Developments III

Postby Okri » Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:24 pm

Is this a real ad? It says "Paid for by Newt" at the end, but wouldn't it say something else?

User avatar
criddic3
Tenured
Posts: 2770
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: New York, USA
Contact:

Re: New Developments III

Postby criddic3 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:40 am

Sonic Youth wrote:
criddic3 wrote:It is a lot of money, but when Obama points to those who make that amount, he makes it seem like some evil thing and seems to equate it with being a millionaire. As some have said, many such people are small business owners who hire people. I concede your point to the extent that it is a lot of money. However, when average people talk about rich people, they are thinking about millionaires. $200,000/yr, even $100,000, is definitely a comfortable place to be (even with all the taxes), but I think you know what I'm talking about.


I give you a lot of credit, Criddic. I've had this discussion with several conservatives, and none of them would concede that $200,000 is a lot of money. I could nitpick over some points you made, but never mind. For once, your answer was refreshing.

On second thought, I'll nitpick. "Millionaire" is sort of a loose term, used to call people who appear rich even if they don't make over a million dollars. They're referring more to a life-style than a gross amount of income. So in a way you're right. Technically, someone who earns $200,000 a year may not be a millionaire. But if you look at their total assets, I'm willing to bet that far more of them are millionaires than you think. And if you're suffering financial hardships when living on such an income, then you're terrible at household management.

Anyway, we've veered off the point. If, as you've conceded, $200,000 is a lot of money, then Gingrich's 2010 income of $2.6 million is "a lot of money" 13 times over. And if he's sincere and doesn't believe he's rich, then he is (as they say) out of touch with the American people. And if you believe he's sincere, then you have no right to accuse Mitt Romney (which I haven't seen you do yet; I'm just saying...) of being out of touch for making a $10,000 bet or saying he likes to fire people.


You bet it's a lot of money. I make around $11,000/yr. I don't mind making that known. People assume that if you're relatively poor you will vote Democrat. There are many reasons not to, and the class warfare is one of them. If i don't make $200,000 a year, it's probably because I don't deserve to. Maybe I'm not smart enough, or maybe life just didn't turn out that way. Anyway, whoever says it's not a lot of money must have a different comparative view of money versus the cost of living. Of course, the more money you have, the more expensive are the things you buy.
“If there’s a concrete wall in front of you, go through it,” Donald J. Trump (May, 2004)

User avatar
Sonic Youth
Laureate
Posts: 7443
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:35 pm
Location: USA

Re: New Developments III

Postby Sonic Youth » Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:11 pm

criddic3 wrote:It is a lot of money, but when Obama points to those who make that amount, he makes it seem like some evil thing and seems to equate it with being a millionaire. As some have said, many such people are small business owners who hire people. I concede your point to the extent that it is a lot of money. However, when average people talk about rich people, they are thinking about millionaires. $200,000/yr, even $100,000, is definitely a comfortable place to be (even with all the taxes), but I think you know what I'm talking about.


I give you a lot of credit, Criddic. I've had this discussion with several conservatives, and none of them would concede that $200,000 is a lot of money. I could nitpick over some points you made, but never mind. For once, your answer was refreshing.

On second thought, I'll nitpick. "Millionaire" is sort of a loose term, used to call people who appear rich even if they don't make over a million dollars. They're referring more to a life-style than a gross amount of income. So in a way you're right. Technically, someone who earns $200,000 a year may not be a millionaire. But if you look at their total assets, I'm willing to bet that far more of them are millionaires than you think. And if you're suffering financial hardships when living on such an income, then you're terrible at household management.

Anyway, we've veered off the point. If, as you've conceded, $200,000 is a lot of money, then Gingrich's 2010 income of $2.6 million is "a lot of money" 13 times over. And if he's sincere and doesn't believe he's rich, then he is (as they say) out of touch with the American people. And if you believe he's sincere, then you have no right to accuse Mitt Romney (which I haven't seen you do yet; I'm just saying...) of being out of touch for making a $10,000 bet or saying he likes to fire people.
"What the hell?"

Win Butler

User avatar
flipp525
Laureate
Posts: 5897
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 7:44 am

Re: New Developments III

Postby flipp525 » Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:52 am

Sonic Youth wrote:
criddic3 wrote:Fairfax County, Virginia ($105,241).

Where I grew up. Sucks that we were apparently #2 that year, though.
"The mantle of spinsterhood was definitely in her shoulders. She was twenty five and looked it."

-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell

User avatar
criddic3
Tenured
Posts: 2770
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: New York, USA
Contact:

Re: New Developments III

Postby criddic3 » Tue Jan 10, 2012 10:23 am

It is a lot of money, but when Obama points to those who make that amount, he makes it seem like some evil thing and seems to equate it with being a millionaire. As some have said, many such people are small business owners who hire people. I concede your point to the extent that it is a lot of money. However, when average people talk about rich people, they are thinking about millionaires. $200,000/yr, even $100,000, is definitely a comfortable place to be (even with all the taxes), but I think you know what I'm talking about.
“If there’s a concrete wall in front of you, go through it,” Donald J. Trump (May, 2004)

User avatar
Sonic Youth
Laureate
Posts: 7443
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:35 pm
Location: USA

Re: New Developments III

Postby Sonic Youth » Tue Jan 10, 2012 12:38 am

criddic3 wrote:
If that story is true, it's simple to explain. "Rich" is in the eye of the beholder. Obama thinks it's anyone earning $200,000 or more.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudoun_County,_Virginia

"Loudoun County ( /ˈlaʊdən/ lowd-ən) is a county located in the Commonwealth of Virginia, and is part of the Washington Metropolitan Area.... As of 2007, Loudoun County has the highest median household income of any county in the United States ($107,207), beating neighboring Fairfax County, Virginia ($105,241). The two counties have been trading places as the highest-income county in the United States in recent years."

In other words, even if you live in the wealthiest county in the U.S., if your household makes $200,000 per year, you're earning much more than most other people who live there. So please stop BS-ing by saying $200,000 isn't rich. That income level is very much in the "rich" category, even if you live in the poshest area in the country.
"What the hell?"

Win Butler


Return to “Current Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest