The Tillman Story

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 16212
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Postby Big Magilla » Fri Aug 13, 2010 3:38 pm

The MPAA seems to be made up of a bunch of old ladies or Fox News Channel devotees these days. Many of the films which were given PG ratings in the 70s and 80s would get an R rating today.

There is more sex on network TV and more violence in kids' video games than there are in many R rated films. But this is a documentary. Kids don't go to see documentaries. If anything, they'll watch it on DVD when their parents rent it.

The "f-bombs" come from Tillman's brother at his memorial, a clip of which has already been shown on TV news channels with the "f-bombs" bleeped out. The Weinstein Company probably knew the ruling wasn't going to be overturned. They probably made the appeal for extra news coverage.

User avatar
Sonic Youth
Posts: 7443
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:35 pm
Location: USA

Postby Sonic Youth » Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:39 pm

'The Tillman Story' loses an appeal to overturn its 'R' rating: Did the MPAA make a mistake?
Entertainment Weekly

After the MPAA handed an ‘R’ rating for language to an acclaimed documentary about NFL-player-turned-Army-Ranger Pat Tillman, the makers of the movie have lost an appeal to have the rating changed to PG-13. The filmmakers tried to argue that The Tillman Story – which delves into the official military cover-up of Tillman’s death in Afghanistan by friendly fire and the way in which he was exploited as a potent patriotic symbol — is exactly the kind of historically significant film that should be exposed to as many young people as possible, not hidden from them due to squeamishness over some bad words. The MPAA clearly didn’t sympathize with that argument, despite the fact that an Iraq War documentary, Gunner Palace, won a similar appeal to overturn its ‘R’ rating six years ago. The MPAA’s ruling follows another recent case in which a documentary about the Holocaust, A Film Unfinished, was hit with an ‘R’ rating for “disturbing images of Holocaust atrocities including graphic nudity.”

What do you think? Did the MPAA dishonor Tillman’s memory — and the freedoms he fought for — by worrying more about f-bombs than about getting his story out to the widest possible audience? Should the ratings board evaluate movies that handle historically important subjects by a different set of standards? Or would that only open an even bigger can of worms?
"What the hell?"
Win Butler

Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests